Nux!


Home » Repos » Report a problem or request a package » Package request: ufraw (EL7) (Unidentified Flying Raw (UFRaw))
Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2927] Thu, 15 January 2015 13:25 Go to next message
Stanley is currently offline  Stanley
Messages: 9
Registered: January 2015
Location: Prague
Junior Member
Is it possible to provide ufraw (version 0.19 or higher) package for CentOS 7 ?

Packages:
ufraw-0.18-2.el6.nux.x86_64.rpm
ufraw-0.19.2-8.fc20.x86_64.rpm
ufraw-0.20-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
failed to install due to dependencies.

Thank you very much in advance.
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2928 is a reply to message #2927] Thu, 15 January 2015 17:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nux is currently offline  nux
Messages: 1659
Registered: January 2012
Senior Member
Administrator

Let's see ...
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2929 is a reply to message #2927] Thu, 15 January 2015 17:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nux is currently offline  nux
Messages: 1659
Registered: January 2012
Senior Member
Administrator

Ok, built, not tested; should hit the repos shortly.
Feedback welcome. Smile
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2930 is a reply to message #2927] Thu, 15 January 2015 20:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stanley is currently offline  Stanley
Messages: 9
Registered: January 2015
Location: Prague
Junior Member
Installed:
ufraw 0.20, ufraw-gimp 0.20
Thank you for your work.

Tested with my camera images.
Reported a bug #394 in ufraw 0.20.
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2931 is a reply to message #2927] Thu, 15 January 2015 21:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nux is currently offline  nux
Messages: 1659
Registered: January 2012
Senior Member
Administrator

Thanks for feedback, feel free to bug me for updates etc.
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2932 is a reply to message #2927] Thu, 15 January 2015 21:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stanley is currently offline  Stanley
Messages: 9
Registered: January 2015
Location: Prague
Junior Member
The above bug prevents me from using ufraw 0.20
together with my camera (wrong image dimensions).

The bug didn't exist in ufraw 0.18 but this version could not be installed on CentOS 7.
Is there a way how to use ufraw 0.18 (version 0.19 was not tested) before ufraw is fixed again?
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2933 is a reply to message #2927] Thu, 15 January 2015 23:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nux is currently offline  nux
Messages: 1659
Registered: January 2012
Senior Member
Administrator

Do you have a link to this bug? Is there a patch for it?
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2934 is a reply to message #2927] Fri, 16 January 2015 00:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nux is currently offline  nux
Messages: 1659
Registered: January 2012
Senior Member
Administrator

I've also uploaded an older version, let me know if it works better
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/ufraw7/
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2939 is a reply to message #2927] Mon, 19 January 2015 18:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stanley is currently offline  Stanley
Messages: 9
Registered: January 2015
Location: Prague
Junior Member
Is it possible to build also ufraw 0.18 for CentOS 7 ?

Regarding the bug: I reported it on ufraw sourceforge page (#394)
but after additional testing it seems more like ufraw/lensfun feature.
I updated a comment there and I am waiting for a feedback.
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2941 is a reply to message #2927] Mon, 19 January 2015 23:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nux is currently offline  nux
Messages: 1659
Registered: January 2012
Senior Member
Administrator

So v0.19 is no go?

http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/ufraw7/
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2944 is a reply to message #2927] Tue, 20 January 2015 21:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stanley is currently offline  Stanley
Messages: 9
Registered: January 2015
Location: Prague
Junior Member
From my point of view, there is no difference between ufraw 0.19 and 0.20. Thank you.
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2946 is a reply to message #2927] Wed, 21 January 2015 19:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nux is currently offline  nux
Messages: 1659
Registered: January 2012
Senior Member
Administrator

Let me know if this ufraw 0.18 works as expected
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/ufraw7/
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2947 is a reply to message #2927] Wed, 21 January 2015 21:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stanley is currently offline  Stanley
Messages: 9
Registered: January 2015
Location: Prague
Junior Member
#rpm -i ufraw-common-0.18-14.el7.nux.x86_64.rpm
OK

#rpm -i ufraw-0.18-14.el7.nux.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
liblcms.so.1()(64bit) is needed by ufraw-0.18-14.el7.nux.x86_64

Checked libraries and there is: liblcms2.so.2 (liblcms2.so.2.0.5).
Not sure if liblcms.so.1 can be installed without other issues or damage.
Perhaps it is better to stop this now...
Thank you.
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2948 is a reply to message #2927] Wed, 21 January 2015 21:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stanley is currently offline  Stanley
Messages: 9
Registered: January 2015
Location: Prague
Junior Member
I can use ufraw 0.19 or 0.20 with lensfun disabled on the command line.
According to documentation, lensfun is enabled by default also in ufraw 0.18 so it probably would have the same result.
It seems that version 0.18 only worked because lensfun was not installed on old machine and ufraw ignored it.
Re: Package request: ufraw (EL7) [message #2950 is a reply to message #2927] Thu, 22 January 2015 09:47 Go to previous message
nux is currently offline  nux
Messages: 1659
Registered: January 2012
Senior Member
Administrator

Ok, so latest version is OK for you now, right? v0.20 that is.
Previous Topic: Package request: gnome-commander (EL7)
Next Topic: [Package Request] Mypaint
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Jun 26 05:29:48 BST 2019

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01291 seconds